By: Enopoletus Harding
@Steve D #40- What was scientific about Marxism? What evidence was it based upon? “So if we’re hard wired for religious belief, maybe it’s because there’s some reality there”-A reality of patterns,...
View ArticleBy: Mike A.
Enopoletus Harding Says: “…-That is why it attempts to be neither.” Well said sir, your unwavering *faith* in “Science” simply proves my point. Humans will always be religious. Be careful though, it...
View ArticleBy: Enopoletus Harding
@ Mike A #46 I do not have faith in science. As says the great xkcd, “It works, b**ches”. Be careful about trying to predict the future. What “environmental impasse” are you talking about? There are no...
View ArticleBy: Shine
Steve D #40, Voltaire simply got the time scale wrong. Everyone knows religion has fallen apart in Scandinavia and Eastern Europe. But in fact, belief has collapsed in Western Europe as well. Germany,...
View ArticleBy: The New Religion
I challenge the premise of the article title. Science will become religion. The theoretical physicists will be the high priests. As the only ones capable of truly understanding their secret and complex...
View ArticleBy: JimmyDean Breakfastsausage
Mike A says: “That’s an interesting viewpoint – blindly accepting that science is always “right”… Remember BPA laden plastics? DDT? Bhopol, India? Eugenics? Nazi Medical experiments? (I’ll stop now but...
View ArticleBy: Frater NNN
“We place no reliance on virgin nor pigeon; Our method is Science, Our aim is Religion.” Motto of the A.’.A.’.
View ArticleClik here to view.
By: Keith Kloor
Thanks, all, for the interesting discussion. I happen to be a long-time atheist. Bertrand Russell converted me at a young age. But I also consider myself a “humanist” in the broad sense of the term. So...
View ArticleBy: Bruce W. Fowler
Can we tell the difference between a refereed article and a piece of opinion? Apparently not.
View ArticleBy: Religion as Tradition « Atheist Help
[...] Discover Magazine has posted a blog called “Why Science Can’t Replace Religion“. [...]
View ArticleBy: Ramon Casha
I disagree with the premise of this article. Religion is not needed at all, period. It does not follow that the replacement is science. For the most part, gods were created as a way to provide an...
View ArticleBy: JimmyDean Breakfastsausage
Regardless how I come across, I too believe in letting others believe what they want to believe. I doubt very much I could change their minds in any case.
View ArticleBy: News Mash: “Science must give way to religion” & “Why Science Can’t...
[...] who is the irrational zealot now? [via DiscoverMagazine] Why Science Can’t Replace Religion- By Keith [...]
View ArticleBy: Peter
Science gives us the true by knowledge studying the reality. It’s a great blessing because only science has increased our conscious, expanded our vision, propitiated increase of the life quality. It...
View ArticleBy: IW
Jerry Coyne has the right take on this: http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2012/08/23/nature-explains-why-science-is-like-religion-based-on-faith/
View ArticleBy: BrentAZ
Science and religion are 100% compatible and the human desire for a relationship with God is undeniable. For those attempting to blame religion for hatred and intollerance, your argument lacks merit in...
View ArticleBy: vel
Religion does one thing, it tells a story to make a human feel important. It makes them sure that they can control the universe, generally by beseeching a being that is no better than those who have...
View ArticleBy: Peter
IW Faith doesn’t explain anything. Faith neither moves machines nor airplanes. Faith didn’t build the computer, nor satellites nor it treats our decayed teeth. The science doesn’t base on Faith to find...
View ArticleBy: Huss D
This is a stupid article that made me shake my head and laugh more than once. While it’s true that we’re wired to be SPIRITUAL, this is only the result of us being previously wired to evade death and...
View Article
